My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
07/20/2000 FIRE STATION BUILDING COMMITTEE Minutes
>
07/20/2000 FIRE STATION BUILDING COMMITTEE Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/27/2018 5:08:44 PM
Creation date
4/27/2018 2:40:00 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Mashpee_Meeting Documents
Board
FIRE STATION BUILDING COMMITTEE
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
07/20/2000
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
t <br /> .Fire Station Building Committee <br /> Minutes <br /> July 2 , 2000 <br /> The Wallace Floyd Desigp Grou Ammann &Whitncy: (continued) <br /> For the record,the Fire Station Building Committee indicated that they <br /> would notify the professional liability carrier, and seek claims for the <br /> burden of additional project costs. The mistake was clearly made. <br /> Discussion followed with respect to the safety aspect and related code <br /> requirements of the building using prefabricated truss and conventional <br /> framing. The architect stated that either option will not effect the design <br /> of the building. <br /> It was noted that trusses are more economical, and are less costly.. with a <br /> truss configuration,the attic space would cut into smaller sections. The <br /> truss is also designed to hold a particular load, while conventional framing <br /> provides more allowance for storage. it is not mathematically designed to <br /> the margin as a truss system. <br /> The Architect stated that the conventional framing required in the design <br /> provides allowance for additional storage. The trusses have less code <br /> requirements. It was noted that truss performance specifications can be <br /> designed to have the sane loading as conventional framing. <br /> The Fire Station Building Committee indicated that it is not their desire to <br /> have a change in the design. They denied the suggestion of the engineer <br /> to design for additional storage and increased loading slaeeifications_ <br /> The Architect stated that the conventional framing will be re-designed and <br /> that Amm.ann & Whitney will design criteria for the fabricator of the truss <br /> solutions. It is the correct and normal procedure for a truss manufacturer <br /> to design truss solutions informed the Principal Architect noting that all <br /> requirements for the conventional method will be detailed. He stated that <br /> he does not believe there will be an impact on construction. <br /> When asked if there are other natters with mechanical issues such as <br /> HVAC, the Architect stated that he will make sure it is coordinated, but he <br /> assured the Committee that it is basic open space_ There is coordination, <br /> but it is minimal. Mr. Bertaux stated that the ceiling in the crew quarters <br /> is 4-5' below the j'oist'. and the apparatus bay is directly below the joist. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.