Laserfiche WebLink
4 r <br /> MA HPEE HIGH SCHOOL. BUILDING COMMITTEE <br /> Tuesday, March `4, 1995 <br /> F' <br /> Page 14 <br /> all issues. Phil stated that all of this has been done. Ed stated a few months ago that they <br /> did not know these would overlap, but now suddenly in a review, we discover that it is a <br /> problem. Paul stated that Bill was going to go back and study the State funding and when <br /> does it trigger the start of the project. Phil stated that we did not get an answer to that <br /> because this larger issue cane up. Phil stated that they called to ask that question and in <br /> the process this issue care up and essentially made that discussion moot and stalled the <br /> previous question. Ed stated that if there is a reimbursement laver charges before the <br /> shovel goes in the ground, you get it. Paul understands that but asked when is it <br /> considered that the shovel goes in the ground; i.e. by signing the contract on phase 1 or <br /> phase 2. Ed stated that it would be the shovel starting the work. Phil stated that the DOE <br /> has said that starting work on the early site package is their consideration of starting the <br /> work. Paul stated that if you said okay, Jim, we do not want your $300,000 which doesn't <br /> trigger the project, which then puts us back to May 1, the issue is thea, it would be nice to <br /> find out politically when DOE is going to vote on the $161 because the 161 may provide <br /> more funding than the $300,000. Phil stated that the DoE is not doing the voting, it is the <br /> Legislature. Paul stated that it was his understanding that once the DOE approves the <br /> submission o the 161, that everyone from that day on is eligible for that money and that <br /> the Legislature will vote for it, and when will it trip in. The Legislature might not vote for it <br /> until next May and it is from that committee meeting when they vote. Phil stated that they <br /> still need an answer to his original question which they do not have that night. Paul stated <br /> they just needed to know the technicality of when the project starts. Ed stated he did ask <br /> him that question and he said actual construction. He said that he could ask that in more <br /> gays and he thinks that by that definition you could get the additional reimbursement on the <br /> building but not the additional reimbursement sitework. Paul stated that as long as we can <br /> get it, he is wondering if they trigger off the project and they close it. Because if not, we can <br /> try to get somebody to find out from the DoE when are scheduling to vote on this thing. <br /> They have to do it pretty soon Because they have to have all of their bills in to the <br /> Legislature by June 1. Ed stated that the request was in. Phil stated that the bill has been <br /> filed with the Legislature but it is a matter of when it conies up for a vote. It was haul's <br /> understanding that once it came out of the DOE committee is when we are eligible for the <br /> ,Honey. Phil stated that no, DOE has made a recommendation to the Legislature to <br /> increase the funding to $161, That has been translated into a bill and the bill has been filed <br /> with the Legislature and where that bill is within the Legislative docket. Paul was wondering <br /> are we are eligible for the money when it comes out of the committee. Phil said no, when it <br /> is voted into law, <br /> Fees Accounts SMI A/P W and ACC: Ed stated that in he had the Off-Site Improvements, <br /> Paul stated that the last thing the attorney asked for was a detailed breakdown of that cost. <br /> Steve stated that the turning lanes and such are not part of your requirement. Ed stated <br /> that they have spent every contingency that every existed on this contract so that the Scope <br /> of Services has to start at the site limit lines. Paul asked Ed to go back to his sub-contractor <br /> and ask him to break it out. Phil said this was in the content of the earlier discussion to <br /> expanding it to include what Greg was talking out. Paul asked in order to get this resolved <br /> one time, to go back and ask to get a fee for phase 1 and phase 2, the entire project} with <br /> breakdown of scope and thea it would be a done dealt In conversation Paul had with <br /> council this week, he seems to be very willing to not take just one side. He seemed to be <br /> trying to find every area which would have some reasonability of it and that is why he said to <br /> let him see the detailed breakdown and maybe then: he could put more judgment light on it. <br /> Phil said they would get that right away. <br /> Early Site Package Surveying Services: Torn stated the surveying services were to be done <br /> by BSS. He said that at the last ,meeting, the Committee had asked for clarification on the <br />