Laserfiche WebLink
.2 <br /> feeprohibitive to use one. If w i l l owbend changed the fee structure and <br /> made it less expensive to use your own carts , more people would use them. <br /> softbal 1 f E e l d• <br /> The applicant is proposing 4 additional tennis courts, with landscaping to <br /> shield the view imernall and a softball field . These are just for use b <br /> members ., <br /> Pat asked if they will be lit? <br /> Bruce said that has not been addressed . He asked if that could be a <br /> contingency,enc in the approval , if they elected to do that i the future . <br /> This area was originally building lots . <br /> pro said at some point, the Board will not want to see less houses . <br /> Bruce said the more improvements they make to the infrastructure, the <br /> greater the value - the greater the assessed value, <br /> Charlie asked when they will show an overall p Ian,? <br /> Bruce said they have a. density distribution plan which anal es what has <br /> beenro osed . They can cone up with a hypothetical master plan , but the <br /> p � <br /> plans for some areas may change slightly . <br /> Pat would like to see how any lighting at the tennis courts would effect <br /> -the abutters . <br /> need a plan of the athletic field , to see where it isgoing . <br /> T ori s a i they'd � <br /> Pat asked if there will be batting cages , etc. <br /> Bruce said that has not been mentioned , that is not their intention now, <br /> but he cannot guarantee that might not change <br /> He said the field will be informal baseball , soccer etc. He does not <br /> expect a lot of use but they do have some demand for i t, They don ' t want <br /> people playing on the fa i rwas . <br /> Lot 37 . <br /> This area was part of the cluster development, single family subdivision <br /> lots , They would like to incorporate i t into the condominium bylaw - 9 . 3- <br /> F ad of This give them flexibility of design, will change the <br /> instead f <br /> setback requirement and allow them to tie into the STP , They are moving <br /> towards unifying the project. <br /> S i g n atu re of Def in it i ve P1 an . <br /> Charlie said the covenant is for construction of a road , not for the Iota <br /> Because the road has been changed, it will refer to a different layout of <br /> roads . He believes there should be a new covenant. <br /> Attorney McElhinney said they would be happy to release the old one and <br /> reference i t on theplan . <br /> bring in a new one. He <br /> will draw t yap and refs <br /> Item e 5 - Minor Modification . Pat said the Board cannot address that <br /> without Town council input. <br /> Pubic Input: <br /> Mr* scarzi said he is concerned about this, This issue brought him to the <br /> meeting . What hat i s the definition of a minor modification? He is concerned <br /> about this definition . Thi s is what the Planning Board rules and <br /> regulations are all about. <br /> 9 <br />