2/4/1985 PLANNING BOARD Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

13 R. Dubin We have a letter from Mr. Brauman and is against the permit because he states it' s another layer of governmental jurisdicb.ion. I think it' s good for the local body to have some kind of rule over the procedure. R.Dubin : Next article: Proposed amendment of Sec. 9. 6 of zoning by' law to add R3N after R-4. A change which will allow the .Design Review Cmttee. to review plans on R3M zones area and R31i going to be a new 40,000 sq. ft. area which is made up of older Rl and R2 areas. This is remedial, it keeps the status quo, something which the Design Review has ties invith an earlier article. Any comments? L. Marsters: Down to the last article. We continued zoning of area on Rte 28, will have to do it now. We want to put up an office building across the street from Augat. People asked pertinent to change , why industrial? It sticks in people' s minds that there is going to be a plant therea and it isn' t true. The reason the professional office uses allow industrial. People have asked why not change to commeriial. tilore an intensive use for commercial and we don' t need coiimeriial, don' t need retail. One good point about putting office buildings there is more ideally suited on Rte 28 than having a parcel for family. l will turn this over to Lr. Dunning. Iir. liunning : phis is a plan which is a composite of the assessors :nap in i,iashpee. (He showed the location oft -the site om the map) Vlha.: we are as �i:i, u e L3oaru o consider of talc zoniri� article to ac:ienu for that ,;art- if t .e zoni.nr7 art:icic which _;reoently providas that this is a cusiueot:iai lot into anti industrial lot to yout up an office co ::�,lex at that lot. Lue to t confi-uration of the lot there is an 10 ft. setbac__ requireient in an industrial zone. Anythinw that w_- Id have to contruct would have to be 150 ft fro:;t Noisy Hole and 15�) ft. fror:: 26. and we vrould have access to the buildi.n,� from noisy hole i�d. nOt �:te. 2 j fro-,.i rile road. 1t is +:i Ur i' eeliliCD that this pattl cular lot is no ion,-er suited for cora .ercial uevelo i-eient in that it is surrounded by industrial and c o:r:.nercial uses and large condo. projects. yhe question was raised if this con .- stitmtes s;3o-t I coni think that it does on a tech- nical bases, due to the fact it ' s across the. street from Augat which is industrial. ;�. :,xarsters: Any zoning khan-es would have to be approved by the attorney general.