My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
7/17/1985 PLANNING BOARD Minutes
>
7/17/1985 PLANNING BOARD Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/31/2025 4:10:37 PM
Creation date
12/6/2019 2:17:14 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Mashpee_Meeting Documents
Board
PLANNING BOARD
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
07/17/1985
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
14
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Zolun of cenglipee <br /> ram_ P. O. Box 1108 <br /> MASHPEE. MA 02649 <br /> PLANNING BOARD MINUTES : 7/17/85 P . 7 <br /> ----------------------------------------------------------------------- <br /> way. Typical construction details are on not only the plan profile <br /> but on the particular sections . We believe that the submission is <br /> adequate and we believe the plans have been corrected as discussed. <br /> with Charlie Rowley and I think it is an approvable plan at the moment . <br /> Mr . Jonas : I have a question - Lot #14 - did you intend to make a <br /> notation on the plan that this is not going to be subdivided? <br /> Mr . McGrath : Oh, No . Because that still has fron,tage on Great Neck <br /> Road and the minimun lot size is 40 , 000 square feet so that <br /> Mr . Ferragamo : You began your comment when you were selling your <br /> plan - you were providing lower density. <br /> Mr . McGrath : Yeah, exactly. <br /> Mr . Ferragamo : There will be no lower denisty if you re-subdivide . <br /> Mr . McGrath : Well , . it is not our intention to re-subdivide at the <br /> moment but to tie up that amount of land - <br /> Mr . Ferragamo : But you opened your remarks by first telling us we were <br /> getting a much better package than we should expect on this piece of <br /> land because of lower denisty and when you look at the total acreage <br /> you are probably right , but when you take a piece of it with a lot <br /> of frontage on Great Neck Road and - I think we have to talk about that <br /> a little bit - particularly when all of yourother major points - <br /> trying to convinceus this is a good subdivision - that it will limit <br /> the amount of egress and access ways onto Great Neck Road, and what I <br /> see happening with that amount of access is a lot of driveways onto <br /> Great Neck Road next to the subdivision. The last point in your <br /> dissertation as to why we should enact a waiver to the paved width - <br /> I am corect in assuming you have a 40 ' - - Your combined acreage is <br /> 26 . 7 acres . Gross acreage - buildable and non-buildable - wetlands . <br /> Everything . You are selling me on getting 10 lots out of 26 . 7 acres . <br /> How much is wetland? <br /> Mr . McGrath : It will take me a few minutes to figure it out . I am <br /> not prepared - <br /> Mr . Ferragamo : So nobody really knows how much is buildable? <br /> Mr . McGrath: It is on the plan - just give me a few minutes . <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.