Laserfiche WebLink
Ejolun of <br /> P. O. BOX 1108 <br /> MASHPEE, MA 02649 <br /> PLANNING BOARD MINUTES : 5/1/85 P. 8 <br /> under 4.10 it says otherwise it shall be applicable to all lands within <br /> 30' of thecenterline of such ways as they appear on the ground. It would <br /> seem to me any road that does not have a layout . Say you have an old <br /> 10' wood road shown on a plan. This would appear to me to constitute <br /> a taking of some 60' of width which would affect the land on both sides <br /> and there would have to be some compensation to the owners if you're <br /> going to do something like that . <br /> Mr. Fudala: I myself would go down to the 40' that we use for a normal <br /> layout . I 'm a little worried going anymore . <br /> Mr. Rowley: Even if you mention a width beyond the limits of the ancient <br /> road . <br /> Mr. Marsters : Because you canl;t take it . You can only prohibit them <br /> from doing it . You can't take their 401 . It 's a good point . I think <br /> if that one sentence was struck it wouldn't affect the intent of the <br /> article and would probably eliminate theproblem. <br /> Mr. Fudala: I wouldn't strike the sentence . I think I 've come up with <br /> a better definition for width. One of my concerns about being in favor <br /> of this article is because a lot of these roads are in critical locations . <br /> Very appropriate locations for future town layouts , connecting various <br /> parts of town. These can get chopped by subdivisions if we 're not <br /> careful.. Again there may be some question on the width, but they want <br /> to at least have a 40' tight of way. An area that will be left clean. <br /> Ms . Tanneyhill: One other reason why we were concerned is because of <br /> what 's happened in the past and to prevent it from happening in the <br /> future . For an example Noisy Hole Rd . crosses 28 and it 's been lost . <br /> Simon's Narrows starts this side of 28 where Noisy Hole Rd . ends . But <br /> that 's been lost because it 's been developed in their or been left in <br /> its natural state . The road no longer exists that was in the past . <br /> Mr. Marsters : We have plans . We 've already layed that out to connect <br /> it back up again. <br /> Ms . Tanneyhill: Oh . <br /> Mr. Marsters : It hasn't really been lost . We 've taken a look at that <br /> and it looks like it 's going to become a road that will be used in the <br /> future and we 've set that aside . <br /> Ms . Averett : One think I 'm concerned about are these ancient ways that <br /> run to the water. We were afraid that many of them would be blocked off <br /> and even though they're supposed to be open to thepublic , developers will <br /> block them off perhaps further down near the water which will prohibit <br /> the public from getting to the water. That 's one thing we 're concerned <br /> about . <br />