My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
4/17/1985 PLANNING BOARD Minutes
>
4/17/1985 PLANNING BOARD Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/6/2019 2:37:31 PM
Creation date
12/6/2019 2:37:03 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Mashpee_Meeting Documents
Board
PLANNING BOARD
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
04/17/1985
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
22
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Zolon of C�N Z154pre <br /> P. 01 Box 1108 <br /> MASHPEE, MA 02649 <br /> PLANNING BOARD MINUTES . 4/17/85 P. 12 <br /> Mr . Marsters : Vle varied the setback from 100' to �11-01 . <br /> Mr. Fudala: The other point we haven't -talked about is -trying to elimi- <br /> nate the number of driveway accesses . <br /> Ms . Stone - That 's done in the village concept . <br /> 11,1�arsters : That doesn't make -too much sense either, because again <br /> it 's too rigid . You could have a lot that corners on 2 streets where <br /> you have to go all around to get in, there again you're causing more <br /> traffic and -there has to be some freedom in -these cases . All you 're <br /> doing is creating more lots so it wouldn't really do anything and in <br /> some cases it may be too restrictive . Can you imagine one entrance into <br /> the New Seabury shopping area? <br /> Mr . 116akunas : Aaain driveways should be based on practical use and not <br /> the number of lots . <br /> Mr . Marsters : Right and again that 's Design Review and Consulting <br /> Engineer. I think it 's much too rigid . <br /> Mr. Fudala: Possibly it 's an adverse affect . I -think there 's a middle <br /> ground to accomplish what we 're trying to do . <br /> Mr . Dubin: Anybody else have any comments on this proposed article? <br /> (there was no one ) If not we 'll close this hearing and it will be <br /> heard a, second time on May 1 . <br /> Petitioner: Merwin Sturgis <br /> Submitted by: John Slavinsky <br /> Location: Mashpee Pond <br /> Type of Plan: Public Hearing on Definitive Plan <br /> Mr . Dubin read the notice as advertised in -the newspaper . Mr. Dubin <br /> then informed Mr. Slavinsky that because they hadn't submitted a list <br /> of abuttors none were notified . But the hearing will be held any way <br /> and continued to May Ist and in the mean-time the abuttors will be <br /> notified . The Board will take a vote on May lst on the plan. <br /> Mr. Slavinsky- explained the plan was for 11 lots and 3 common areas , <br /> but it 's not a cluster. He said the Board suggested increasing the <br /> dirt way -to a gravel way at the cul-de-sac . They created a 4,01 wide <br /> easement along the traveled way for lots 8 , 9 & 10 . Mr. Rowley said <br /> they should better define the 40 ' easement as he would want to know <br /> where it is by using 'bearings , Mr . Slavinsky agreed to define it , <br /> Mr . Dubin asked if there were any comments from the audience . There <br /> were none and he continued the public hearing -to May 1. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.