Laserfiche WebLink
phosphorus and an additional 14 ponds, bays and estuaries impaired with nitrogen and bacteria. <br /> At this point, Mashpee has completed planning documents, a stormwater management plan and <br /> developed a task force. During year 2, there would be public review and reporting, which was <br /> occurring at this meeting, update of mapping and development of a good housekeeping plan to <br /> create an inventory of 32 sites with a potential for pollution, as well as development of a <br /> construction bylaw. Stormwater system mapping had been initiated by AmeriCorps and outfalls <br /> had been reduced to 16. Regarding the bylaw review, Ms. Belfit confirmed that upon review, it <br /> was necessary to make revisions, such as site plan review and inspections, improved written <br /> procedures and adoption of a checklist. In addition, it was necessary to address language <br /> bringing the bylaw into compliance with the general permit. <br /> Mr. Balzarini inquired about the two year delay to acquire the as built plans and Ms. Belfit <br /> responded that it was the language in the permit. Mr. Lehrer noted the approved plan typically <br /> became the as built. Mr. Rowley agreed with Mr. Lehrer, adding that any major changes he <br /> found, he required the applicant to return to the Board for a potential modification and <br /> recommended that, following inspection, the applicant should be able to provide the as built <br /> plans. Mr. Lehrer suggested that if the Board anticipated any additional changes to the Articles <br /> prior to the Warrant being executed, Ms. Belfit could likely assist with wording. Mr. Lehrer <br /> confirmed that the Articles submitted reflected the needs of the permit. Mr. Rowley inquired <br /> why Site Plan Review would serve in an enforcement capacity, when they were typically <br /> advisory, while the Planning Board and ZBA were special permit granting authorities. Ms. <br /> Laurent noted that some projects did not require approval from the Planning Board or ZBA, so it <br /> would be important not to allow those projects to fall through. Mr. Lehrer suggested that there <br /> were very few projects that went only to Design Review. Mr. Rowley inquired about the <br /> definition of urbanized area and Ms. Belfit confirmed that Mashpee fell within an urbanized area. <br /> Ms. Waygan referenced the Priority of Work Plan, and suggested residents may wish to become <br /> more involved as the public learned about the state of the waterways. Ms. Belfit responded that <br /> lists of opportunities and events were available when reading the Stormwater Management Plan, <br /> although there was a limited budget available to fund activities. Ms. Waygan suggested the use <br /> of CPC funds for stormwater control if it was impactful to a pond. Ms. Belfit responded that 35 <br /> Town owned facilities had been identified within Mashpee, which would be further inspected to <br /> identify and prioritize potential retrofits to mitigate nitrogen, phosphorus and bacterial impacts. <br /> Mr. Hansen inquired about storm drain markers in Mashpee and Ms. Belfit confirmed that 99% <br /> of the Town's drains traveled to leaching catch basins, adding that there were some locations that <br /> could benefit from identifying the outfall with a visibility marker, coinciding with public <br /> education. <br /> BOARD MEMBER COMMITTEE UPDATES <br /> Cape Cod Commission-Ms. Waygan reported that the Cape Cod Commission was <br /> seeking community input from individuals and organizations regarding a Climate Action Plan for <br /> Barnstable County. Interested parties could apply online to become part of the discussion at the <br /> CCC website. Mr. Lehrer added that the Commission was also seeking to spread the word <br /> regarding very low Cape response rate to the Census, and encouraged all to complete the Census. <br /> Community Preservation Committee-No report <br /> Design Review Committee-No meeting <br /> 3 <br />