Laserfiche WebLink
MEETING MINUTES <br /> MASHPEE ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS <br /> SEPTEMBER 11,2019 <br /> The Board said that there will always be traffic in that area no matter what type of business <br /> is at this lot. Both Mr. Goldstein and Mr. Furbush are more concerned with the Variances <br /> requested. There were no more comments on these traffic concerns. <br /> Jonathan wanted Chris to summarize the storm water report. He said that there are updated <br /> studies on rainfall intensity values for the 2, 10, 25, and 100 year storms. Charlie Rowley <br /> did review his study and saw some high intensity sources. Chris said that Charlie was okay <br /> with the method but wanted the rainfall events for all the four storms. Jonathan wanted an <br /> explanation of the 3 8/89 sq. ft. landscape area and the 1-5 ratio landscape to pavement plan <br /> and how this would affect the water runoff. <br /> Chris said the more pavement,the bigger the infrastructure,the more water will have to be <br /> treated.He said that the system is designed in conformance with storm water policies. Chris <br /> said that it's a pre-existing non-conforming lot, and there's very limited room. <br /> Mr. Bonvie asked Attorney Kirrane to explain the pre-existing non-conformity. Attorney <br /> Kirrane said it's just the lot that has protection. He is not seeking any protection relative to <br /> the pre-existing building; it would have to have been rebuilt within a specified period of <br /> time to preserve that protection. In a C-2 Zoning District the minimum lot area is 40,000 <br /> sq. ft. and 200 ft. of frontage. Mr. Bonvie asked if Wampanoag Ave were to be considered <br /> useable land for this proposed use the lot coverage will exceed the allowed 20%. Attorney <br /> Kirrane said if it were not allowed there would be a need for additional Variance relief. <br /> The Board said it would require a lot of research for the land court plans. Mr. Bonvie asked <br /> Attorney Kirrane if he would be prepared to do the necessary work to prove to the Board <br /> that the paper road is not included in the lot coverage. Attorney Kirrane is prepared to do <br /> that research. <br /> Mr. Goldstein read the Town Department comments into the record. The Board read some <br /> submitted letters with similar concerns on traffic, the type of use, and the size of the <br /> building. <br /> Jonathan read the letter submitted by Charlie Rowley dated September 11, 2019. He <br /> announced that he will read the list of residents' names that submitted email letters. He <br /> announced that he would allow public comments with limited timing. <br /> Ms. Joanne Peters who resides at 54 Sassacus Road is located directly behind the project. <br /> She had concerns regarding the lighting on the building,the size of the building,the traffic, <br /> the delivery trucks, the possible pollution, dumpster removal, snow removal and sanding. <br /> She mentioned she was not aware there was a paper road located near her property. <br /> Jay Bernasconi at 4 Sagamore Road is concerned about the variance requests, and the <br /> traffic issues in the area. He thought that the traffic study was unrealistic. <br /> Mr. Doug Semple, lives at 43 Sakonnet Drive mentioned that the previous building on the <br /> lot did not have parking in the rear. He mentioned that the traffic engineers do not know <br /> the specifics of the vehicles movements that create a hazardous situation. <br /> 11 <br />