Laserfiche WebLink
i <br /> Attorney Garner provided a copy of Conservation <br /> Restriction Deed for the current property owner, which was <br /> reviewed by the Town Planner. <br /> The Town Planner requested the Deed to the Town be <br /> provided in order to determine the Town' s interests in the <br /> property. <br /> Attorney Garner agreed to provide said Deed, noting <br /> however that the current owner is subject to the initial <br /> reservation rights and access . <br /> The Town Planner agreed the owner has the right t <br /> access, not necessarily the right to subdivide and access <br /> two lets. <br /> There wa-s some discussion regarding the number of <br /> waivers- that would be required in order to meet road <br /> requirements - <br /> The Consulting Engineer stated waivers would not be <br /> required to upgrade a road if it is to be constructed by <br /> those standards approved by the Board. He found some of <br /> the waiver suggestions to be confusing and unnecessary. <br /> Attorney Garner responded some of the waivers were <br /> listed to waive construction in the form of a- secondary <br /> access . <br /> The Consulting Engineer stated he feels the plan is <br /> not clear or complete with respect to the application. It <br /> does not meet the typical standards for a preliminary <br /> sbbr ittal . A drainage easement has been shorn on the plan, <br /> however no drainage is being proposed. He suggested the <br /> access be shown more clearly. <br /> Attorney Garner explained the intent is to show the <br /> existing way includes the minimum standards, the secondary <br /> form of access/egress is shown for engineering purposes <br /> only, with no intention of being constructed. <br /> The Consulting Engineer expressed his agreement with <br /> Dennis Bal ar.ini who has stated .it is not physically <br /> possible to construct the secondary access over wetland. <br /> He noted it would more than likely be cost prohibitive for <br /> access to only two lots. <br /> 8 <br />