Laserfiche WebLink
August 18th date on which the Building Inspector stopped <br />,issuing permits at Southport, the subcommittee suggests <br />that any occupancy .permits for .such units -be -issued . <br />Due to the significant amount of time which it will <br />tale for completion of the old Barnstable Toad improvements <br />called for in condition #16 of the -198 .Special Permit <br />modification, the subcommittee suggests that the Building <br />Inspector not purue.enforcement of that condition at this <br />time with- regard to te_ issuance. f_ building permits-, <br />As there have apparen.ti -been _numerou-s -charges t <br />phases I and II of the project which are not consistent <br />with the final site development plans approved by the ZBA. <br />and Planning Board for those phases, the developer shall, <br />_f-ile -with -the - BA -anal Planning Board revised final site <br />development plans for those pluses showing the project as - <br />built -and any other revisions proposed- for. those phases <br />along with a description of all changes between the as - <br />built and proposed plan and the previously approved final <br />site development plan. <br />These plans, pursuant to the. 1- 7 By-law and. condition. <br />- - - o of- t-he:- -Special --Permit -modkfIca-t-ion will requi-re- - - - --- <br />approval of both the ZBA and the Planning Board before the <br />project can be considered in cnf'ormance with its permit <br />and building- permits should be. iss-ued..- <br />.- iv n- -the number o -changes-and the level of resident <br />concern about the matter, the -subcommittee recommends that <br />both Boards conduct their review of these plans in an <br />advertised public hearing format. <br />T -is. -r.eco me ded -_that the ZBA ice iew--- rnd -approval be <br />.at a conceptul -level and also review consistency of the <br />site plan change ,with the By-law and Special Permit <br />conditions; and that,the ZBA decision be conditioned on <br />Planning Board approval of the final plans.. The Planning <br />Boa-rd-'-s -revriew :would- -be. of =a more�..Mdetailed-na--t-u-r -t l-ng <br />F advantage of its consulting Engineer and include the items <br />called for in the -.law .and the requiremen-ts annexed to <br />the 1985 Decision. <br />i t - -t r.e-modi-f-ications to the approved fi-nal site <br />development plans, as well as the approval of the final <br />site development plan for phase III shouldfollow ollow the same <br />process except that -depending on the scale of any proposed <br />i8 <br />