My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
05/02/2007 PLANNING BOARD Minutes
>
05/02/2007 PLANNING BOARD Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/24/2022 5:08:04 PM
Creation date
1/24/2022 4:08:50 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Mashpee_Meeting Documents
Board
PLANNING BOARD
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
05/02/2007
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
17
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
topography of the site. Applicant will be required to <br /> provide a significant amount of revegetation throughout the <br /> site. Where is really very little that can be done to <br /> preserve these areas of concern. <br /> The Chairman asked Mr. Rowley if Applicant would be <br /> following Best Management Practices with regard to managing <br /> and treating stormwater runoff. <br /> Mr. Rowley replied that to the best of his <br /> understanding there are two-three areas that will use Best <br /> Management Practices connected with storm drainage. The <br /> first is located around the pond where a rain garden will <br /> be constructed which will receive drainage from the cul-de- <br /> sac. A number of trench drains that had been proposed <br /> earlier for roof runoff have been removed. Another rain <br /> garden design is being proposed for a section located at <br /> the southwest portion of the pond. The remaining drainage <br /> on the site i.s the same drainage design as was constructed <br /> for Phases 1 and II . There is insufficient room to <br /> construct swails without causing erosion. <br /> Mr. Rowley further noted that drainage issues along <br /> Leisure Green Drive North need to be addressed and <br /> reviewed. He has concern for the placement of discharge <br /> outlets/possible erosion impacts with respect to the <br /> proposed walking path around the pond. <br /> In response to a question raised by John Halachis, the <br /> Town Planner clarified that this project does require <br /> Conservation Commission review under the State wetlands <br /> regulations, as well as the Town wetlands Bylaw, neither o <br /> which is grandfathered under the Special Permit. <br /> Mr. Rowley responded to a question rai-sed by Dennis <br /> Bal. arini regarding the quality of fill to be used, Mr. <br /> Rowley informed the Hoard that testing has indicated -that <br /> the soils throughout the site are very similar and that the <br /> final grades will be satisfactory with little potential for <br /> wash out conditions. However, the construction process may <br /> require siltation curtains or temporary storm rater systems <br /> in order to avoid sediment from being impacted into the <br /> proposed drain-age systems . <br /> Lee Gurney inquired about the location of the proposed <br /> construction entrance for Phase III.. <br /> 6 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.