Laserfiche WebLink
•%I <br /> its <br /> both at the local and regional level . A few <br /> however,, are <br /> exclusively for DRI and `mould be labeled as such, Developments <br /> of <br /> Regional Impact. <br /> I <br /> Margo Fenn noted that the reference made in the Inttoduction <br /> of the water Section suggesting they are adopted by o reference for , <br /> , <br /> the purposes of DRI is inadequate. The intent beingto <br /> incorporate the standards at the <br /> town level 1 for the purpose of r, <br /> consistency from town to town. She suggested eliminatingthe <br /> e <br /> reference to DRI, or state specific standards that are not to be <br /> included. The Commission would allow discussions for <br /> justification if Mashpee chooses different standards from those <br /> at the regional level. She further suggested the use of one <br /> clear statement to be used in each section of the Plan in order <br /> to eliminate confusion. F <br /> The Chairman stated philosophical problems <br /> p p ems due to the fact <br /> that the Regional Policy Plan is a regulatory document; the Local z <br /> Comprehensive Plan. is not until such time as the Town Bylaws are %;t} <br /> brought into compliance with the P y <br /> p Plan. <br /> . <br /> t Margo Fenn responded that although regulations are not being <br /> adopted by reference in the Plan, indications are that the Town <br /> supports the standards and would like implement them. <br /> The Town Planner stated a lot of effort had �been made to <br /> develop the Policies that are particular/appropriate to mash pee. `{ <br /> The process has been ongoing f or f our to f ive years, some of pill <br /> which,predated the Regional Policy Plan. His point being it i <br /> now difficult p g s <br /> to disregard the work the Town has put into the r <br /> Plan in order to parrot the Regional PolicyPlan. Also h � <br /> + . e - <br /> mentioned the Commission has had difficult enforcing <br /> Y its <br /> regulations on single-family homes, etc. He stated the Town <br /> would be placed in a very difficult position if it is expected to <br /> P � <br /> enforce regulations the Commission has been unable to enforce. <br /> Margo Fenn quoted from the Regional Plan: "In general the <br /> r <br /> Minimum Performance Standards and the othe <br /> r development review <br /> Policies of the Regional Plan are intended to be used both by the <br /> r + <br /> Commission and local regulatory authorities, such as Planning <br /> Boards, Boards of Health, Conservation Commissions, Historical <br /> Commissions, and similar bodies once they p have adopted a Local ' <br /> , <br /> Comprehensive Plan and it has been certified by the ' <br /> Commission. • • t! She interprets this to be a goal for count wide '' <br /> consistency in Land Use regulation. lit <br /> •1. <br /> The Town Planner raised questions of "consistency, " and � <br /> stated the regulations go into a greater level of detail. <br /> Margo Fenn replied the local Planning regulations state than f' <br /> in order to be considered i n h 1 consistent,t, the Goals and Minimum <br /> Performance Standards of the Regional anal Plan have t o be included <br /> g � <br /> t She suggested Mash pee do this b ref erence b saying, "in � <br /> p Y �' y g► � <br /> -2_ <br /> ,i <br /> f' <br />