Laserfiche WebLink
t <br /> ct`• ` ,configuration. There has been much discussion regarding ways in <br /> which to lessen the impact on existing and future unit owners as <br /> - the ] <br /> project is developed as it relates to construction. There <br /> p <br /> ::. has also been a substantial amount of discussion regarding <br /> } architectural and other issues. <br /> Attorney Butler suggested the proposed modification of <br /> ` time due to the fact that <br /> r 1 Special Permit not be discussed at this <br /> number of issues included in the unit owner agreement will be <br /> � as additional provisions in <br /> inserted and proposed to the Board p <br /> the Modification of Special. Permit. The proposed unit owner <br /> agreement will also result in a consensus on dealing with the <br /> _ The following l l owin are issues of <br /> - viability of the Special Permit, g <br /> general consensus subject to documentation: Revisions to the <br /> site plan; Discussion on phasing- A number of issues ,regarding <br /> . { .responsibility of roadways; Revisions to the condominium, <br /> documents allowing for a better sharing of control for unit <br /> owners on issues relating to the condominium; <br /> Confirmation of a <br /> developer subsid ; Discussion regarding the infrastructure as it <br /> P � d the new waste <br /> � 4 relates to the waste water treatment plant an <br /> water <br /> r discharge permit0 New common areas being a pool, pavilion, <br /> post 3 <br /> office building; covenant language concerning construction <br /> clean up, limitations on signage, prohibition on rental of the <br /> rf units b the developer. Where was a specific requirement that an <br /> y <br /> engineer be retained (Mr. Eldredge) paid f or by the developer. <br /> The supervising engineer is to supervise all clearing, <br /> p g <br /> foundations and roadways to insure compliance with the open Space <br /> Plan. construction of a. separate construction entrance, specific <br /> L garbage disposal areas, unit owner consents, and other issues <br /> g' g p <br /> � <br /> have been addressed. <br /> Referring to the Plan, Attorney Butler pointed out the <br /> tens orar construction entrance. with regard to phasing, there <br /> } p y <br /> r is to be a ring around the existing unit owners, which will be <br /> kl; g <br /> �' he first hale to be built. The division of responsibility line <br /> r• <br /> was also pointed out. Attorney Butler requested Mr. Eldredge <br /> r <br /> t , address the plans at this point. <br /> Mr. Eldredge identified the original plan approved in 1988 <br /> Y and the proposed p 3 plan. The original plan shows two (2) tennis <br /> courts the proposed plan shows one (1) . There 9' is indicated <br /> proposed <br /> 'wd <br /> meetinghouse shown on the new plan, The old plan a <br /> -�t <br /> large building representing the sewer treatment plant; a smaller <br /> �' g, p <br /> ` is been proposed. Mr. Eldredge pointed out the <br /> building g P p <br /> .s original and the new line of division of responsibility. <br /> Thomas Fudala clarified that the division of responsibility <br /> is not to be what is developed and what is to be open space, but <br /> rather the portions of the open space which are to be the <br /> Trustees of Reservation restrictions, the remaining area to <br /> E be Town Conservation restrictions. <br /> Mr. Eldredge indicated the network of roads depicted on the <br /> proposed plan an as being essentially the same as the original. plan <br /> p <br /> ° with three exceptions: Blue Heron Drive has been moved <br /> - :' approximately twenty-f ive (2 5) feet to the East, an area referred <br /> to as "the race track" has been eliminated and a road has been <br /> = y� brought through to Blue Heron Drive; and an area showing one <br /> �4- <br /> ry <br /> � 3 <br /> { <br /> l+ <br /> li . <br />