Laserfiche WebLink
f <br /> i <br /> N <br /> Attorney Butler said they would be i agreeable to a condi■ g ton <br /> ZIl the R' <br /> Special Permit whereby spot checking of effluent would be <br /> conducted. Mr. Chaplin said an independent StatecertifiedI�. <br /> P 4 <br /> operator, laboratory and professional engineer would be involved , <br /> in the process <br /> Keith Dolby, President of F.R. Mahoney & Associates ��� <br /> supplier and developer of wastewater 44 <br /> �P P e treatment plants, stated t <br /> f this is a less costly system to build and operate and has the A.1 <br /> ability to treat to the lowest Levels available. ,..' <br /> Mr., Eldredge stated the Dimaximum �'�� <br /> g Discharge Permit requires a <br /> - nitrate Level of ten parts per million at the discharge pipe , <br /> IT- <br /> (going into the leaching facility) , which could never exceed <br /> ten parts per million. In order to assure this, the plant has <br /> been designed for a lower level. The level is basically five r � <br /> parts per z ■ f}pa■ ■p million. The actual nitrate levels at the discharge " <br /> pipe zs to be approximately five parts per million. Levels ` <br /> tend to be less in winter, The level of nitrates below the <br /> leaching facility will be less than whatever is going in. pus <br /> Nitrate levels based on recharge concentration for the entire , ^ <br /> site, based on Cape cod commis i�. son methodology,F ■P ogy, �s three to <br /> four parts per million based on a discharge of ten parts per <br /> million. At five parts per million, the number is probably <br /> going to be lower, but not half. � <br /> Thomas Fudala requested total pounds of nitrogen per year be <br /> provided at some point. t� <br /> P <br /> Attorney Butler addressed the prior request for a fiscal <br /> analysis. Assumptions were made based upon current tax rates and <br /> cost per pupil for one child for every five condominium units, <br /> total tax revenues would be a three to one ratio over anticipated ` , <br /> educational expenses. other fiscal impacts are minimal with <br /> regard to overall Town fin <br /> g antes. , <br /> Attorney Butler stated they attempted to show a comparison <br /> of the prior plan/proposed plan; no significant change in total r,' <br /> overall Coverage including buildings, impervious coverage, <br /> 2 pavement and roadways. Building size- another site visit and <br /> construction access roadways are all issues for further <br /> discussion. Although an agreement has not been reached with <br /> the unit owners, they continue to try to be responsive to the <br /> issues and concerns raised. If there are to be no further <br /> discussions with unit owners, Applicant would request an ultimate <br /> determination from the Board as to the Modification of Special <br /> Permit. Some additional provisions of the Modification include <br /> an upgrade/improvement to the biomonitoring program, additional <br /> letter of credit, prohibition of de-icing chemicals to be used on <br /> P g ;9 <br /> the premises, oil/gas separators for catch basins, approval of <br /> ;L fertilizers/pesticides and low-flow toilets. <br /> , <br /> ur Attorney Butler commented that the project has been sitting <br /> for a long while, the developer is prepared to deal with it, a <br /> lot of w ork has been lane, they have acquired feedbag from the <br /> Board and continue to be responsive to the unit owners. He is '. <br /> looking to the Board for direction at this point, agreed to <br /> another site visit, agreed to obtain updated information on <br /> wastewater/biomonitoring; at which point he would request <br /> f <br />