Laserfiche WebLink
In answer to a question posed by the Chairman, Mr. Rowley <br />answered, anything that is a retaining wall has to be engineered <br />and approved by the Building Inspector. Mr. Eldredge stated the <br />plan would be mailed to the engineering company for specifics, at <br />which point it would go out to bid, and finally it would be <br />sealed by a Massachusetts engineer. <br />The Chairman made reference to a retaining wall located in <br />Marstons Mills, which was constructed with a reversed step on its <br />face.. <br />The Town Planner took issue with the parking space <br />situation, stating there is not sufficient room in which to back <br />out. He also pointed out the non-functional sidewalk design. He�� <br />also stated his concern regarding visibility. Mr. Eldredge <br />stated he was trying to followthe original plan as much as <br />possible. (References were being made to the plan at this point, <br />there was discussion regarding details of the garage situation.) <br />$y <br />TheChairman asked if a portion of the loop is to be <br />p P <br />eliminated. Mr. Eldredge indicated the area in question is to be <br />reconfigured. <br />At this point Mr. Eldredge provided and made reference to a <br />Numbers Chart-Windchime Point -dated October 11, 1997. He stated r� <br />the overall project had been incorporated into the analysis and <br />divided into three and one half phases. Phase I has been <br />constructed; Phase IB is currently being proposed, Phase II � <br />and Phase III. Phase I and IB-previously proposed is the sum of <br />Phase I -constructed and Phase IB-proposed, with the exception of <br />the driveway/parking area. 1k <br />The proposal is eight hundred and seventy-one (8 71 sq. ft.) <br />greater in footprint than what was previously approved, a 1.4% <br />difference. There will be no changes in the entire project; <br />although there are some changes within each of the Phases. <br />Fourteen (14 ) units have been constructed; forty-three ( 4 3 ) units �n <br />are being proposed in the current phase, for a total of fifty- <br />seven (5 7 ) units. The original total number of units for the <br />entire project was one hundred seventy (170) units, which has n �� <br />been reduced to one hundred forty-two (142). Eighty-five (8 5 ) <br />units will remain within the next two phases. <br />There has been a decrease of two (2) units within Phase IB, <br />from forty-five (45) to forty-three (43) units. Forty-eight (48) <br />r <br />units in Phase I I ; and forty-nine { 49 } units in Phase III <br />are being proposed; for a total of one hundred forty-two (142 ) <br />w <br />units. <br />Twelve (12) garages are being proposed, rather than the <br />area of twelve 22 x 24 ft . garages <br />�I <br />original fifteen (15). The a �' �' <br />is 6,336 sq. ft . as opposed to fifteen garages at 6,000 sq. ft . <br />coverage, an increase of 336 sq. f t . or 5.6 % increase. <br />-5- <br />!JA4 <br />