Laserfiche WebLink
j <br /> the location for the vehicle, which said second floor has no connection <br /> j <br /> i <br /> whatsoever with Defendant Hatcher's request for a variance. <br /> 15. I object because the said second floor affects the zoning district in which it <br /> will be located, and is not necessary to circumstances relating to the soil j <br /> i <br /> conditions, shape or topography of Mr. Hatcher's land. <br /> 16. I object because the second floor is in no way necessary to the protection <br /> of the Hatcher vehicle nor does Mr. Hatcher suffer a substantial hardship, <br /> financial or otherwise, if he is disallowed the second floor by literal <br /> enforcement of the Mashpee ordinances or by-laws. <br /> i <br /> 17. I object because the creation of a second floor does substantial detriment j <br /> ' I <br /> I <br /> to the public good in that it changes the identity of the summer vacation <br /> i <br /> neighborhood near and about 20 Elliot Road where there are no similar <br /> I <br /> garage type buildings with second floors. <br /> 18. I object because the Mashpee Board of Appeals never afforded me notice <br /> to be hard at the Board of Appeals hearing. <br /> 19. I object because at all times I have provided Defendant Hatcher with plans <br /> of legal changes to my dwelling, and Mr. Hatcher, in return, has not j <br /> reviewed his plans with me and instead went before the Zoning Board of n <br /> Appeals during the winter months when summer residents are unavailable <br /> I <br /> to view notice by publication or posting. i <br /> i <br /> 20. 1 honestly believe I have been misled by Defendant Hatcher when he <br /> requested and obtained the variance to protect his vehicle from weather <br /> and salt from the ocean, and then intends to construct a garage wherein <br />