Laserfiche WebLink
I <br /> i <br /> Title 5 Code and State wide Regulations by design. (The 99 <br /> Restaurant issue has been rectified and Cooke' s has a $200, 000 .00 <br /> septic system. ) <br /> Mr. Fudala stated the Board of Health would be the local <br /> agency in control of regulations. (There was some discussion as <br /> to nitrogen limitations, technology and permitting requirements <br /> and monitoring as they pertain to economic development. ) <br /> .a <br /> Richard Terry stated a lot of time and effort is being put <br /> into local, county and state regulations. Most business people <br /> take great pride in their businesses and have a willingness to <br /> cooperate with the Town. He has confidence in Mashpee's elected <br /> officials, Board Members and the Business Community to protect <br /> Mashpee' s environment and to provide jobs within Mashpee for <br /> Mashpee residents. <br /> y <br /> Planning Board Members' input: Dennis Balzarini inquired as <br /> to guarantees new businesses establishing in Mashpee will hire :. <br /> Mashpee residents for available positions. <br /> Mr. Fudala said the Town could provide tax incentives for <br /> new businesses and could require, by way of conditions, that a <br /> certain number of Mashpee residents be hired. <br /> (There being no further Public or Board questions regarding <br /> the Economic Development presentation; Mr. Fudala reiterated <br /> there will be a presentation on Coastal Resources, by Eric r <br /> Smith, as well as comments by the Shellfish, Conservation and I'ua <br /> Waterways Commissions on December 18, 1996 at 7: 00 p.m. ) <br /> Coastal Resources <br /> Ed Baker commented on what appears as a conflict between the <br /> Executive Summary-Opinion Survey and page -1- of Goals and <br /> Objectives regarding waterfront properties hurricane/flood <br /> damage; The lack of coordination with neighboring towns (dredging ' <br /> costs, navigational aids, at Mashpee' s expense) . Mr. Baker <br /> further commented on dredging, mooring fees and boat excise <br /> taxes. He inquired as to the Waterways Improvement Account. <br /> Jim Hanks responded that the current Waterways and iV ' <br /> Improvement Fund does collect half of the excise tax. The tr: <br /> Waterways and Improvement Maintenance Fund collects the mooring <br /> fees. The Town Accountant is in the process of determining how <br /> many Town funds pertain to Waterways and their uses. <br /> Ed Baker suggested half of the funding is boating excise; s <br /> and half mooring fees; and initiating a Reserve Fund for theo,E� <br /> mooring fees to be used for Waterways. He also suggested a legal `•, <br /> opinion be sought from Town Counsel regarding the validity of <br /> said fees (charging a select group of people to maintain <br /> waterways, rather than all users) . {+ <br /> i, <br />