Laserfiche WebLink
16 Great Neck RoadWorth <br />9vNashyee, .?Massachusetts 02649 <br />Mr. Fulone noted hybrid is a lot to manage, all in person or all virtual is suggested. <br />Youth Engagement Toolkit: <br />Ms. Sweet assembled a number of activities for students. They want to form a student based <br />committee. The students can brainstorm some branding and graphic ideas for the LCP. This is in the <br />preliminary stages. They are coming up with ways in which kids can think about their community and <br />offer feedback on how they see the community growing. It is important to have the students comment <br />on what they feel is attractive in the community. <br />Ms. Waygan likes this. She would like to incorporate some commercial, residential, and introduce <br />zoning terms as well as architectural and site design standards. Mashpee has a lot of vegetative and <br />landscaped buffers. Try to incorporate not just the use but how it looks. People won't approve of a <br />project if it has ugly architecture, she wonders if the students would pick up on that. <br />Ms. Sweet said this is just one example of a full toolkit. Different grade levels will have different toolkits. <br />One other exercise is asking kids to walk their neighborhoods and identify what they see, and what they <br />would like to see that is not currently there. Different activities will address different issues. Once all the <br />toolkits are complete they hope to cover all topics. Keep in mind this is teacher led, so they are trying to <br />make it as easy as possible for teachers to implement. <br />Ms. Waygan received the list of stakeholders and she has added many more groups. She did not see <br />the Children's Museum, Boy Scouts, Waquoit Bay National Reserve that has a productive estuary, <br />other churches, as well as human service providers. She will E-mail her contributions to Mr. Lehrer with <br />appropriate contacts and phone numbers. Outreach to these stakeholders needs to be figured out as <br />well. <br />Mr. Lehrer stated they are targeted to directly participate in workshops but also personal visits and <br />interviews. <br />Ms. Waygan had conversations with Mr. Lehrer regarding the official list of documents regarding the <br />Regional Policy Plan and the technical bulletins. Place types are addressed in each technical bulletin, <br />there is one on open space. She explained there are different levels of performance that offset <br />mitigation depending on what place type you're in. The Cape Cod Commission document does not <br />summarize well. Part of the work we do now could be to summarize that. She does not want a part of <br />town in a place type where we are not going to ask for traffic mitigation. She does not want to lose <br />affordable housing because of a certain place type. They really have an impact on the Town. She <br />wouldn't want to miss a benefit to a larger development in Town because of hopes of certain mitigation <br />offset from years ago it being labeled as such. A helpful tool for the place types with respect for <br />technical bulletins would be useful. <br />Mr. Fulone has a question regarding stakeholder meetings. Who is taking the information and how is it <br />summarized and then presented back to the community? <br />