Laserfiche WebLink
16 Great Neck Road North <br />Mashyee, Massachusetts 02649 <br />vetted the platforms contract terms, site functions, aesthetics, and costs. They were narrowed down to <br />CitizenLab and coUrbanize. They are both wonderful and offer similar packages. CitizenLab was <br />chosen primarily due to difference in cost. It has better customization and the base package allows for <br />flexibility to build out the site while it stays active, and it will easily carry over into implementation. The <br />site could continue to gain data as the plan is implemented. This is something he will consider in the <br />future budget, it would be nice to have this site live on and be referenced five years down the road. One <br />other benefit is the quick turnaround to launch the site by the first of the month as planned. <br />Ms. Waygan went on the CitizenLab website and she thought it fits this project well, it's a citizen based <br />approach. It has a strong planning emphasis and she thinks it's a good choice. <br />Mr. Fulone asked which pricing option he is recommending. <br />Mr. Lehrer is going to opt for the low pricing option. He doesn't want to eat up the cushion budget. This <br />platform provides flexibility with the ability to add tools that may be needed later. <br />Chairman asked if there was consideration for more than one year, are there flexible contract terms? <br />Mr. Lehrer stated flexible contract terms could be 18-24 months. He wants to get a consensus before <br />he reached out to define contract terms. If this is okay for the Board, he will ensure this program gets us <br />through well within the budget. <br />Mr. Fulone inquired about the option to keep it going afterwards at a discounted rate. <br />Mr. Lehrer will approach that in the next fiscal year for Town Meeting. <br />As Mr. Lehrer just wanted the Boards blessing, everyone was in agreement this platform will be a great <br />option. <br />Ms. Waygan showed a document from the packet. She asked if this was what the town wrote, the <br />Mashpee, Ma Community Engagement Plan. <br />Mr. Lehrer commented that was built off of the conceptual document attached to the RFP. It was not <br />exactly what they had written, it was written by Weston & Sampson and modeled after the concept that <br />was designed. <br />Ms. Waygan stated the words in the chart don't match the words in the documents. She is curious if <br />they are going to use the words as is or use the words from the engagement plan. When she read <br />"Public Threat" she was not sure what that meant, but now she knows it would be a public workshop. <br />Ms. Waygan also noted under February, it should say site visit. She inquired if they would do that <br />together. Lastly, she asked about the updated stakeholders list. <br />