Laserfiche WebLink
subdivision. However, as an engineer he cannot certify it <br /> is a good road because he knows the subsurface is a problem. <br /> They understand they have some obligation if want to put in <br /> 9 lot subdivision. <br /> Tony how this will be prorated or shared? <br /> Mr. Connely stated they will leave that to the Planning <br /> Board based on traffic over the roadway. They feel it is an <br /> ongoing, long standing deterioration and think the public <br /> access is going to be more significant than theirs . <br /> Louise stated that Mr. McGrath's letter stated an assertion <br /> of belief. They will need something to base this on rather <br /> than just an assertion. <br /> Tony stated that the next step is for McGrath and Ernie <br /> a Virgillo to get together an estimate of what it costs to do <br /> the work and then get together with the Board to di'scuss <br /> portions . <br /> There is a bene f it to the public i f the road gets f ixed. If <br /> they can come to an agreement on costs, they will then have <br /> to secure the applicants share of the project. <br /> Water Quality Monitoring Easement issue. <br /> They discussed Mr. Connely's Jan. 23rd letter as related to <br /> the new Special Permit draft. Mr. Connely' s comment have <br /> been incorporated into the changes. <br /> Mr. Connely's letter item IV dead issue - <br /> i tem. VI - dead issue <br /> item VIV - Board of Health issue. The applicant has -no <br /> objection <br /> item VVI Otis Easement -- has no problem with it. <br /> Monitoring Program - Mr. Connely just received it tonight. <br /> The language of the Special Permit incorporates the - <br /> agreement of the easement access and monitoring wells. His <br /> consultants will review this . <br /> item VxIII - Mr. Connely is concerned that they may not be <br /> protected. <br /> Lee stated it is a boiler plate item that has been used in <br /> other special permits . <br /> Judy stated that it is telling the applicant they are not <br /> the last board and it is the applicant' s responsibility to <br /> deal with all other licensing. <br /> Mr. Connely Agreed to it the way it written. <br /> item #27 - Mr. Connely stated that it might be read that <br /> individual homeowner need approval of the Planning Board. <br /> The first sentence was changed to read "shall require prior <br /> approval" not notification. <br /> item #26 - will leave it requiring a 4 member vote. <br /> Mr. Connely will approach Ernie Virgill io to expl ay:; the <br /> issue and then will meet with Mr. McGrath and Judy will sit <br /> in on that meeting. <br /> 3 -- <br />