My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
07/20/2022 PLANNING BOARD Minutes
>
07/20/2022 PLANNING BOARD Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/29/2025 2:57:01 PM
Creation date
8/8/2022 12:14:09 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Mashpee_Meeting Documents
Board
PLANNING BOARD
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
07/20/2022
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
24
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
16 Great Neck Road North <br />Nashpee, Massachusetts 02649 <br />congestion, should it just say traffic. There are some inconsistencies and he is wondering if we should <br />be consistent. You don't self -impose a descriptor. In question four, we talk about the loss of small town <br />character. Maybe some people don't think there was a loss of small town character. Overall, it's a <br />question to Mr. Martin, should we be consistent in using descriptors or not, his preference is we don't <br />impose on them. <br />Ms. Waygan asked if he wanted to use town character or rural character, where Mr. Fulone just wants <br />the word character. She notes that character could also be the character of a person. <br />Mr. Lehrer noted it depends on the question. He went through this exact lens with Ms. Sweet for hours. <br />In 2011 survey there was something about quality of life and the term sluggish economy was used. We <br />proposed getting rid of sluggish. Depending on the question, he tried to remove issue or clarify words <br />that give you a certain feeling, meaning will make you will respond a certain way if a question used that <br />particular descriptor. For traffic, we are talking about problems. When traffic volume is moving well it's <br />not a problem, the congestion is the problem. We are trying to gauge what the problem is. <br />Mr. Fulone asked if they would say traffic flow. <br />Ms. Waygan asked if he wants to say town character. She thinks we need an adjective. You choose <br />rural or town. <br />Mr. Fulone stated he prefers town character. <br />Mr. Balzarini noted page 45 has the wording of loss of small town character. <br />Ms. Waygan will tag that and moved back to question three. <br />Mr. Fulone stated for question three he would add a separate choice for born and raised here. In some <br />places we say attainable/ affordable and in other places we don't. <br />Mr. Lehrer tried to use attainable, as the former surveys contemplate affordable housing as meaning <br />one thing, then affordable housing that specifically references low income housing. The issue has <br />grown to impact people with greater incomes. It's about the attainability of housing. Attainable housing <br />was a good way to frame that. <br />Ms. Waygan would like to finish the section of quality of life. Question four, population growth, if you just <br />leave population that just means the people itself. Keep growth, or add decline. <br />Mr. Lehrer discussed this one with Ms. Waygan today as well. Population needs to be quantified <br />because we are talking about problems. The population is not declining, we know by the data it is <br />increasing. If we are asking a question about population, the growth is either not a problem or it is. In <br />his opinion, it is appropriate to qualify it with a descriptor. <br />12 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.