My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
12/04/2024 PLANNING BOARD Minutes
TownOfMashpee
>
Town Clerk
>
Minutes
>
PLANNING BOARD
>
2020-2029
>
2024
>
12/04/2024 PLANNING BOARD Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/7/2025 9:52:45 AM
Creation date
1/17/2025 8:39:52 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Mashpee_Meeting Documents
Board
PLANNING BOARD
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
12/04/2024
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
apof MAS�Fe <br />INC. IBIN <br />n <br />�AOTamnw M�� <br />Board <br />North <br />16 Great Neck Road <br />Mashpee, Massachusetts 02649 <br />Proposed Amendment to the ADU Bylaw <br />Ms. Waygan put in a request for Town Counsel to review the Affordable Homes Act and <br />compare it to our Zoning Bylaw. Town Counsel may recommend zoning changes that will bring <br />us into compliance. <br />Proposed Amendment to the Raze and Replace Bylaw <br />The Board received correspondence from Bob Orsi with the Popponesset Working Group. <br />John Malloy is present as Co -Chair of the Working Group. This was brought about by <br />concerned residents that don't have the money to build larger homes, but want to stay in their <br />homes, ("age in place") while complying with code in moving electrical upstairs from basement <br />level, but not being able to expand. <br />Ms. Waygan stated Ipswich and Dennis have a bylaw for this. Falmouth now has a Warrant <br />Article, it is in the packet as correspondence, something worth reding as there might be <br />verbiage in there. You cannot create a `new non -conformity', they are existing nonconformities. <br />Conversation ensued regarding lot coverage ratio limitations in the floodplain. If you have land <br />in the 100-year flood plain, you cannot calculate that land. This upsets residents. <br />Ms. Waygan understands the frustration but that won't ever go out of zoning. There are some <br />extreme cases where you are in the floodplain completely or the majority. When you redo, it <br />must be built on stilts or pilings. The point might be moot, but we need a lesson. In the velocity <br />zone you are absolutely on pilings. <br />Mr. Fudala said their lot coverage at 25% is higher than for the rest of town with 20%. Many of <br />those houses were built before zoning, and grandfathering puts them applicable to 1959, but <br />those projects are subject to grandfathering, some of these homes predate zoning. The <br />Overlay was requested by the neighborhood to keep very large homes from being built, which <br />is why the height limit is 30ft. vs 35ft. <br />The Working Gorup would like to see tear downs tighten to current zoning regulations. Mr. <br />Malloy does not agree with the floodplain lot coverage calculations. He wants to tighten the <br />rules on drainage, the neighborhood is supportive of more permeable materials as opposed to <br />paved driveways. <br />5 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.