Laserfiche WebLink
*REVISED DRAFT* SELECT BOARD MINUTES JUNE 24, 2024 7 <br /> Select Board <br /> Minutes <br /> June 24,2024 <br /> APPOINTMENTS & HEARINGS <br /> JOINT MEETING WITH THE PLANNING BOARD <br /> Discussion and Possiblew A royal of the Housing,Production Plan: Town Planner Evane Lehrer: (continued) <br /> Mr. Lehrer noted that this is a 5-year plan that would not be revised for five years. . He stated that the goal <br /> should be that upon adoption to implement the plan and evaluate changes that may be necessary as <br /> conditions change. <br /> Mr. Lehrer stated that the plan does not include strategies that incentivize beyond the Flow Neutral Bylaw <br /> and that there is no intent to dismiss the Flow Neutral Bylaw. He added that the language in the plan <br /> explains Title V and what is needed for compliance without compromising the wastewater goal. <br /> Select Board Member Weeden stressed the need for equitable housing,rather than market rate housing. He <br /> also suggested that this joint meeting should be for discussion of the plan, rather than a vote. With regard to <br /> making good use of Chapter 40B as a vehicle for creating affordable housing,he recommended that <br /> Strategy#1, Collaborating with Mashpee Commons should be removed. He stated that he did not think that <br /> any one group should be singled out in a strategy. Mr. Lehrer noted that the Mashpee Commons reference <br /> was included in the document because Mashpee Commons was granted a permit for 382 units in several <br /> phases and there is a potential for additional units to be created, a portion of which would be affordable. <br /> Mr. Weeden expressed concern the housing to be produced would not meet the population needs. In the <br /> Needs Assessment Mashpee is noted to have a slightly higher representation of minority populations and <br /> households tend to be smaller. There is a need for equitable housing for all family types and income levels. <br /> A matrix format was previously recommended for inclusion into this report. <br /> There was broad agreement across the two boards that the Town needs affordable housing,that 185 units <br /> over the next 5-years is reasonable, and that the Town needs to resolve its clean water issues. Select Board <br /> Member Wyman-Colombo noted that Mashpee residents were assured at Town meeting that the Town <br /> would mitigate nitrogen with a promise to retain the 0%financing for the sewer work. Therefore,the <br /> Town must adhere to the Flow Neutral Bylaw to reduce nitrogen pollution and enable the Town to qualify <br /> for 0% financing from the Clean Water State Revolving Fund. Mr. Lehrer and Ms. Lanzillotta stated that <br /> there was no intent to amend flow neutral in this plan. It was suggested that any references to the Flow <br /> Neutral Bylaw be redacted from the plan. <br /> Mr. Lehrer responded by stating the plan articulates strategies within the confines of the Flow Neutral <br /> Bylaw. The plan is required to identify(3)barriers to housing and ways in which the barriers could be <br /> explored. Thus,the reference to the Flow Neutral Bylaw must be added. In response, Planning Board <br /> Chair Waygan agreed that the State requires that the plan identify barriers but stated that the town did not <br /> need to name the flow neutral bylaw as a variable. She stated that here are plenty of other barriers that have <br /> been identified so striking the flow neutral bylaw would not be a red flag for the State. <br /> Workforce housing is also an important aspect of the plan. Select Board Member Wyman-Colombo agreed <br /> that the Town needed workforce housing and expressed concerns that the plan, as written, lacks strategies <br /> to ensure that workforce housing will be protected for the workforce. She stated that without some form of <br /> deed restriction the new housing could be purchased by second homeowners or investors for short term <br /> rentals. <br />