Laserfiche WebLink
 Mr. Cook motioned for a continuance to October 24, 2024, at 6:36 pm. Mr. Sahl <br />seconded. No further discussion. <br />Roll Call: <br /> Mr. Cook (Yes), Mr. Sahl (Yes), Ms. Godfrey (Yes), Ms. Thornbrugh (Yes), and Mr. <br />Colombo (Yes) <br />o The motion passed unanimously. <br />Applicant Action Items: <br /> Provide missing nitrogen loading calculations <br /> Submission of waiver requests and clarification on house footprint <br /> Detailed planting plan and project narrative to be prepared <br /> Verification of flood zone lines and mitigation planting details <br /> <br />Documents provided: Notice of intent application and project narrative; October 5, 2023, Existing conditions; <br />September 5, 2024, Plot plan – Site and Septic Upgrade Plan (no increase in flow) (2 sheets) <br /> <br />6:51 <br />NOI #43-3308 <br /> 25 Riverside Road, Kerry Oliver; Representative: Cape & Islands Engineering, Inc. <br />Mark Dibb <br /> <br />Project Overview: <br /> Raze and replace of an existing single-family dwelling <br /> New construction smaller in overall footprint, Flood zone compliant <br /> Upgrades include a new I/A Septic System <br />Environmental Concerns: <br /> The project site includes areas identified as salt marsh, with historical imagery showing <br />changes in the landscape from a beach to a salt marsh over time <br /> Test pits were conducted to investigate soil conditions, revealing layers of sand, loam, <br />and pear, suggesting historical alterations before the Wetland Protection Act <br />Proposed Solutions: <br /> A new salt marsh line was proposed, aligned with the flood zone line, to protect the area <br />from further maintenance <br /> Permanent markers were suggested to delineate maintenance boundaries, allowing the <br />salt marsh to grow naturally <br />Commission’s Feedback: <br /> Concerns were raised about the effectiveness of small posts as barriers, suggesting more <br />substantial barriers like a split rail fence or dense plantings <br /> The Commission discussed the need for a physical barrier to prevent future encroachment <br />and ensure compliance by future property owners <br />Public Comment: <br /> None <br />15 <br /> <br /> <br />