Laserfiche WebLink
of TMs s,s <br /> z. <br /> AU�1MLIUV��y <br /> own qf MaS 2 Panning Board <br /> c� <br /> 16 Great Weck RoadWorth <br /> -Mashpee, -Massachusetts 02649 <br /> Mr. Pesce stated based on testimony and documentation from applicants and engineer, all <br /> comments have been satisfactorily addressed. <br /> Mr. Tobin noted some overlap and would like clarification. The DPW raised questions about <br /> the Sediment Control Plan with the pear trees being removed. Post Planning Board, pre- <br /> issuance of building permit, all requests from the Fire Dept., such as an oxygen box, <br /> accessible sprinklers, and alarm testing must be met. <br /> Mr. Pesce answered that this site is already built, there is no separate erosion control plan, it is <br /> addressed on the plan. <br /> Ms. Faulkner inquired about the May 15th correspondence to the Town Planner, regarding roof <br /> runoff being directed to a new leaching basin of crushed stone, in paragraph 6. The basin is <br /> designed for the 100-year storm, she would like an explanation of that. <br /> Mr. Eddy explained how the leach pit is designed for roof runoff. A single leach pit handles a <br /> 100-year storm. Using specialized software HydroCAD, given calculations and size, runoff will <br /> not be large. Stormwater exceeds its original design. With underground stormwater <br /> management, a smaller footprint, and topography layout, the building is further away from <br /> stormwater and proposes a separate leach pit at the west end to collect by gutters and roof <br /> drains. There is good soil and we are able to control on site. <br /> Mr. Pesce noted additionally, they also follow NOAA Atlas 15. The National Weather Service <br /> provides data on precipitation frequency. Mashpee is 7.5. <br /> Mr. Tobin confirmed compliance with the setbacks, he agrees with use analysis,and would like <br /> to go over the flow capacity. It is not stated in the packet, but it was noted there was enough <br /> flow for several restaurants. <br /> Mr. Hansen loves that Building F no longer exists. He questioned if a knee wall is enough <br /> protection for diners. Europe has bollards lining the streets for pedestrians' safety. <br /> Mr. Scott stated the knee wall provides a level of protection. A bollard is anchored into the <br /> ground 3-4 feet deep, while a knee wall is sitting on the foundation. It does not provide the <br /> same anchorage. <br /> Mr. Eddy stated it is not common practice to line a building with bollards. <br /> Karen Johnson with Brand Street Properties, managers of South Cape, commented Building F <br /> was removed to utilize parking more efficiently. At each iteration, they had to look hard at the <br /> 4 <br />