My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
02/20/2025 CONSERVATION COMMISSION Minutes
>
02/20/2025 CONSERVATION COMMISSION Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/18/2026 5:30:28 PM
Creation date
7/21/2025 3:22:04 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Mashpee_Meeting Documents
Board
CONSERVATION COMMISSION
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
02/20/2025
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
17
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
• Property is in land subject to coastal storm flow (AE flood zone with BFE of 39) <br /> • Closest coastal resource is the beach (185 ft to east) <br /> • Proposal includes replacing septic system with UA technology (nitrogen loading: 11.92 <br /> mg/L) <br /> • Current footprint: 934 sqft dwelling +289 sqft deck= 1,223 sqft <br /> • Proposed footprint: 1,107 sqft dwelling + 81 sqft deck= 1,304 sqft <br /> • Total lot coverage would increase from 36% to 39% <br /> • Despite larger footprint, impervious area would reduce by 52 sqft due to pervious egress <br /> • Septic will be mounted <br /> Flood Zone and Foundation Questions <br /> • Clancy Construction confirmed foundation will be crawl space with smart vents <br /> • Commission concerned about building plans not being submitted with application <br /> • Construction methodology questioned due to tight lot(4 ft from foundation to property <br /> line) <br /> • Commission worried about neighboring property disruption during construction <br /> • Debate whether house should be placed on pilings instead of concrete foundation <br /> • Confirmed property is located in an AE zone, not Coastal A zone <br /> Plan Requirements and Setback Concerns <br /> • Discussion about whether architectural plans are required for Conservation Commission <br /> • The agent clarified building plans not explicitly required in current regulations <br /> • Commission concerned about construction impacts with only 1.5 ft between cantilever <br /> and property line <br /> • Contractor referred to previous successful project with similar constructs across the street <br /> • Commission requested landscaping plan details <br /> • One small Japanese maple (1.5" diameter) to be removed during construction <br /> • Discussed the possibility of moving house eastward to provide more buffer on west side <br /> • Contractor indicated house placement was carefully considered for parking needs <br /> Continuance Requested and Next Steps <br /> • Discussion about whether project needs ZBA approval first (Concluded: no) <br /> • Commission requested construction methodology narrative for addressing erosion <br /> concerns <br /> • Foundation plan with flood vent details (locations, sizes)requested <br /> • Discussion about potentially reusing existing septic tank with I/A system <br /> • Continuance requested for March 6tn <br /> Agent Comments <br /> • The entire lot is previously altered. No existing naturally vegetated areas <br /> • New home to be flood zone compliant <br /> • N loading calculations provided and meet the Reg 30 threshold <br /> • No landscaping details. Any proposed lawn areas must be less than 10% of lot's square <br /> footage <br /> 11 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.