My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06/11/2025 ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS Minutes
>
06/11/2025 ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/18/2026 5:29:21 PM
Creation date
8/5/2025 12:24:31 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Mashpee_Meeting Documents
Board
ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
06/11/2025
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
13
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MASHPEE ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS <br /> MEETING MINUTES <br /> JUNE 11, 2025 <br /> Mr. Reidy read the Conservation Department comments dated June 11, 2025 into <br /> the record: Resource Areas: Coastal bank, buffer to coastal bank, buffer to bordering <br /> vegetated wetland (BVW), and LSCSF, NOI application received unanimous approval <br /> due to mitigation plantings on coastal bank and buffer zone to coastal bank, relocation <br /> of shed off of edge of coastal bank, and drywell installation to control roof runoff. <br /> Conditions for approval are switching of mitigation planting of Carolina rose to clethra <br /> and three year mitigation and monitoring contract with a qualified horticulturist. <br /> Mr. Ganzenmuller read the Board of Health comments dated June 11, 2025 into the <br /> record: No increase in bedrooms, house to remain 3 bedroom, Title 5 <br /> Inspection needed for changed in footprint. <br /> Mr. Furbush asked if the lot is in the wetlands. Mr. Bright said; no. <br /> Mr. Bonvie asked what the current closest dimension setback was from the <br /> wetlands. Mr. Bright said; 16 ft. The Board asked what exists and what setback <br /> relief is being requested from the wetlands. <br /> The Board had a discussion and could not locate the dimensions on the site plan. <br /> Mr. Goldstein believes that the project will be within the same footprint. Mr. Morris <br /> agreed. The plan said that there's no changes. <br /> The Board wanted confirmation of the dimensions. Mr. Morris read the relief <br /> required would be from the proposed rear deck. Mr. Goldstein confirmed that the <br /> proposed changes are within the same footprint which is not changing the setbacks, <br /> but will slightly increase the lot coverage percentage. <br /> The Board confirmed that the site plan was to their satisfaction. Mr. Goldstein <br /> questioned that the extra room in the basement located on the building plan should <br /> have a 5 ft. cased opening to eliminate a fourth bedroom. The Health Agent stated <br /> in his comments that the house should remain a three bedroom. <br /> Mr. Morris noticed a note on plan that the existing shed "to be relocated". Mr. Bright <br /> said that during the meeting with Conservation, the Commission requested the shed <br /> be moved out of the coastal bank. <br /> Mr. Morris also mentioned that the plan has a notation to "request after the fact <br /> approval for the installed iron fence, and a stockade fence". Mr. Morris recommended <br /> that the Board does not approve or disapprove of that notation. <br /> 4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.