Laserfiche WebLink
MASHPEE ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS <br /> MEETING MINUTES <br /> JUNE 11, 2025 <br /> 7. Any changes to the plans will require the applicant to return to this Board. <br /> 8. Conditioned that the applicant seek and obtain the Building Department review <br /> in reference to the Tree Bylaw Chapter 175 of the Town Bylaws prior to the <br /> application of a building permit. <br /> 9. The Board finds under §174-17 and §174-33 that the proposed project is not <br /> substantially more detrimental than the pre-existing, nonconforming structure or <br /> use to either the Town or the neighborhood. <br /> Ms. Sangeleer second. <br /> Mr. Furbush, yes, <br /> Mr. Goldstein, yes, <br /> Mr. Blaisdell, yes, <br /> Mr. Bonvie, yes. <br /> All were in favor to issue a Written Finding. <br /> 14 Tulip Shell Way : Owner, Wingspan Properties, LLC requests a Special Permit <br /> under §174-17.1 and §174-33 of the Zoning Bylaws to raze and replace a single- <br /> family residential structure with a new single-family residential structure on <br /> property located in an R-3 Zoning District, Map 124, Parcel 25, Mashpee, MA. <br /> Attorney Christopher Kirrane represented the Owner, Michael George who was also <br /> present. This lot is located on Seconsett Island under the R-3 Zoning District and <br /> has minimum dimensional requirements of 40,000 sq. ft. of lot area, 150 ft. of <br /> frontage, 40 ft. front yard setback, 15 ft. side and rear setbacks, 20% lot coverage <br /> and a 50 ft. setback from wetlands. In this particular lot has two front yard setbacks <br /> and two rear yard setbacks. Attorney Kirrane pointed out that Tulip Shell Way is <br /> situated on both sides of the existing dwelling as noted on the site plan. <br /> There are several nonconforming situations. The whole lot is in the flood zone and <br /> has zero square feet of lot area even though there is 14,558 sq. ft. of upland lot area, <br /> there is 100% lot coverage. The lot does not meet the 50 ft. setback from wetlands, <br /> and does not meet the 40 ft. front yard setbacks to either side of Tulip Shell Way; <br /> there's currently a 25.6 ft. and 23.6 ft. where 40 ft. would be required, and does not <br /> meet the rear yard setback of 13.2 ft. where 15 ft. is required. <br /> The Board has to find that there are no new nonconformities being created; there <br /> are none, that there is plenty of parking sufficient for two vehicles. There is a gravel <br /> driveway to provide two parking spaces, and that the proposal is not substantially <br /> more detrimental than what exists. <br /> 6 <br />