Laserfiche WebLink
th <br /> Mr. Tavares asked for a continuance to Sept 4, 2025. Mrs. Thornbrugh motioned for a <br /> <br />th <br /> Continuance to Sept 4. Ms. Godfrey seconded the motion. <br /> <br />th <br /> Voting on the motion to continue to Sept 4, 2025: <br /> <br /> Mrs. Thornbrugh (YES) <br /> <br /> <br /> Ms. Godfrey (YES) <br /> <br /> Mr. Sahl (YES) <br /> <br /> <br /> Mr. Colombo (YES), <br /> <br /> Mr. Cook (YES) <br /> <br /> <br /> Motion passes (Unanimous 5-0) <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />NOI 55 Redwood Circle, Edward & Rudite Pilpel. Proposed addition to existing dwelling, remove <br /> <br /> septic system and replace with Title IV IA system, remove and rebuild retaining wall, and <br />43- <br />3352 <br /> mitigation plantings.(Representative: Tom Bunker BSS Design Inc.) <br /> <br /> Mr. Bunker described the project and acknowledged they have not received comments from <br /> <br /> <br /> Natural Heritage yet on this proposal. Mr. Bunker also acknowledged that N loading calcs have <br /> <br /> not been provided yet. Angela Tanner of Crawford Land Management described the mitigation <br /> <br /> <br /> planting plan. Mrs. Thornbrugh mentioned that N calculations have not been received and waiver request was <br /> <br /> not sufficient. She also inquired about the Natural Heritage correspondence. Mrs. Thornbrugh <br /> <br /> <br /> asked about square footage clarification of mitigation plantings. Mrs Tanner clarified about <br /> <br /> plantings and square footages. Further conversation ensued. Mr. Colombo referenced Reg. 33 <br /> <br /> <br /> (riverfront) and the 5,000 square footage threshold. Mr. Colombo asked the applicant if they <br /> <br /> were requesting a variance from zoning. Mr. Bunker clarified they are seeking a special permit, not a variance. <br /> <br /> <br /> Mr. Colombo asked what the total square footage of disturbances is existing on the lot. Mr. Bunker did not have <br /> <br /> that information available. Mr. Colombo informed Mr. Bunker that this information on square <br /> <br /> <br /> footage of disturbance should be provided to ensure that the threshold for alterations within <br /> <br /> riverfront is not exceeded. Mrs Pitt expressed concerns about steepness of the bank and stability of the bank <br /> <br /> <br /> during any construction activity. Additional conversation regarding construction methodology and erosion <br /> <br /> control between commissioners and Mr. Bunker ensued. Agent Kent recommended <br /> <br /> <br /> adding construction methodology to a revised project narrative that addresses bank stability and erosion <br /> <br /> control. Additional conversation regarding beech trees on the site, which have been impacted <br /> <br /> <br /> by Beech leaf disease and any other trees thatmay be impacted by proposed activities. <br /> <br />th <br /> Mrs Thornbrugh motioned for a continuance to Sept 4, 2025. Mr. Sahl seconded the motion. No <br /> <br /> <br /> discussion. <br /> <br />th <br /> Voting on the motion to continue to Sept 4, 2025: <br /> <br /> <br /> Mrs. Thornbrugh (YES) <br /> <br /> Ms Godfrey (YES) <br /> <br /> <br /> Mr. Sahl (YES) <br /> <br /> Mr. Colombo (YES), <br /> <br /> <br /> Mr. Cook (YES) <br /> <br /> Motion passes (Unanimous 5-0) <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />NOI 89 Bluff Avenue, John & Kirsten DeSanto. Proposed raze of existing dwelling and construct <br /> <br />43- <br /> and maintain new single family dwelling with I/A septic system upgrade and mitigation plantings <br />3355 <br /> (Representative: BSS Design Inc and Yarmouthport Design Group). Mr. Bunker of BSS Design <br /> <br /> <br /> and Andrew Garulay of Yarmouthport Design Group described the proposal. Mrs. Thornbrugh <br /> <br />10 <br /> <br /> <br />