My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
03/20/2025 SEWER COMMISSION Minutes (2)
>
03/20/2025 SEWER COMMISSION Minutes (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/18/2026 5:32:37 PM
Creation date
1/5/2026 11:35:14 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Mashpee_Meeting Documents
Board
SEWER COMMISSION
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
03/20/2025
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Town of Mashpee Sewer Commission <br /> t <br /> 16 Great Neck Road North <br /> Mashpee, MA 02649 <br /> Ms. Rudenko stated that she has responses to questions that were asked at the February 2025 meeting. <br /> First question that was asked was a comparison of how the buildout was developed for the 2015 Plan vs. <br /> the most recent watershed plan update. In the 2015 plan, it looked at the entire project planning area <br /> (all of Waquoit Bay, all Popponesset Bay instead of separating out just Mashpee). For Mashpee, in 2009, <br /> the Mashpee Planning Dept. did a parcel-by-parcel analysis looking at what development they felt could <br /> be done in Mashpee. In the newest evaluation,the Town of Mashpee Pass Flow Neutral by-laws.This is <br /> the newest zoning and is what regulates how much growth can happen on a parcel. When looking at the <br /> maximum build out that is allowable,they are looking at what is allowed under the flow neutral <br /> regulations. She then explained what the comparison between the two are. <br /> Ms. Rudenko stated that the next question that was asked at the last meeting was what were some of <br /> the major changes between the TMDL Compliance Plan that was outlined in the 2015 plan, and this first <br /> update in 2025? One of the updates was to evaluate the water use data so all the calculations from the <br /> 2015 plan were done based on MEP current numbers and these have been brought up to the last three <br /> (3)years of water use.They are now working with updated nitrogen loads.The original plan also <br /> recommended evaluations to consider sending flow to private facilities including Mashpee Commons, <br /> the Wampanoag Facility and Joint Base Cape Cod. As these evaluations have not progressed to <br /> negotiations to convey flow,they are now looking at options to treat that flow through the municipal <br /> facility. So, no longer relying on private facilities and sizing municipal infrastructure to be able to treat <br /> that flow.The third major change is the decrease in the shellfish aquaculture component and a related <br /> increase in the sewering component to pick up that nitrogen management.They have also incorporated <br /> the Wetland Restoration Project so at this point, GHD is not carrying a nitrogen removal credit, but there <br /> is a recommendation to implement a monitoring program so that the nitrogen reduction from those <br /> programs can be tracked and as part of a future watershed management plan,they'll be incorporated <br /> into the TMDL Compliance Plan and then they can look at adjusting the technologies; what can be <br /> reduced—since nitrogen removal through those water wetlands is happening. GHD also added the <br /> Innovative and Alternative Regulations (I/A Regulations) that have been passed by the Board of Health. <br /> GHD is looking at the conversion of Title V septic systems INAs for portions of town that are not <br /> scheduled for sewering. Mr. Nair asked Ms. Rudenko to explain regarding the municipal facility that GHD <br /> stated could be used? Ms. Rudenko stated that as part of the 2015 plan, Mashpee does have a number <br /> of facilities, and it was recommended that GHD evaluate whether those facilities can be expanded, and <br /> Municipal flow can be sent to them. GHD has evaluated the Mashpee Commons and Wampanoag <br /> facilities, and those discussions have not progressed past an evaluation to negotiations to send flow <br /> there so at this point, other options are being discussed.The other was to send flow from the Western <br /> portion of the Town of Mashpee from Waquoit Bay to Joint Base Cape Cod.This is still an option that the <br /> Town of Mashpee can consider but negotiations have not progressed far enough for it to be the primary <br /> option at this point. Mr. Nair asked if the current plan for Popponesset Bay may still require tapping into <br /> private facilities and Phase 1 and Phase 2 may not be enough? Ms. Rudenko answered that Phase 1 and <br /> Phase 2 will not be enough and at this point in the plan, all of the flow is being directed to two new <br /> facilities;the one that is currently in construction (which will continue to be expanded so it is a modular <br /> facility and GHD is currently doing an evaluation to site a new plan in the Western portion of town, in <br /> the Waquoit Bay watershed. Ms. Rudenko stated that she wanted to be clear that Popponesset Bay will <br /> require additional phases of sewering to meet its TMDL and sewering has not occurred at all in Waquoit <br /> Bay. A member of the audience asked Ms. Rudenko to repeat the method that GHD is using to calculate <br /> build out and repeat the buildout numbers for year-round and summer. Ms. Rudenko answered that the <br /> buildout numbers were from the Original 2015 analysis and for 2025, GHD is using the Flow Neutral By- <br /> Laws and looking based on the restrictions and what is the maximum development that can be done in <br /> each of the watersheds. Ms. Sprout asked for clarification of the buildout regarding sewerage vs. septic <br /> systems and since there is a greater density, building development can be built up and asked if the <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.