Laserfiche WebLink
Town of Mashpee Conservation Commission <br /> 16 Great Neck Road North <br /> Mashpee, MA 02649 <br /> NOI 126 Waterway, Theodore E. & Sandra Stoia. Raze and replace. <br /> (Representative: Falmouth Engineering) 43- <br /> 3380 <br /> Mike Boricelli, Falmouth Engineering,presented the project on behalf of the applicant, along with Brian <br /> Wall of Troy Wall Associates, attorney for the applicant, and Ian Warner of Acer Landscape Design. The <br /> project involves the demolition and reconstruction of an existing single-family dwelling at 126 Waterway, a <br /> 16,000± square foot lot with frontage on Popponesset. <br /> Mr. Boricelli identified wetland resource areas associated with the property, including land under the <br /> ocean, a narrow wetland band, a non-eroding coastal bank, and land subject to coastal storm flowage. The top <br /> of the coastal bank and all wetland buffers were shown on the plans, including the 150-foot buffer, noting that <br /> the entire lot lies within the buffer zone. <br /> The proposed work consists of raising and reconstructing the existing dwelling without increasing the <br /> footprint or moving closer to the top of the coastal bank. The new structure will be slightly smaller than the <br /> existing house and will maintain the same number of bedrooms (two). The house will retain a walkout <br /> basement configuration similar to existing conditions. Minor site modifications are proposed in the front yard, <br /> including reconfiguration of the driveway to improve access and allow limited visitor parking. <br /> The existing septic system will remain in place. Mr. Boricelli explained that the system consists of a <br /> 1,500-gallon septic tank and leaching field located in the front yard and has already been approved by the <br /> Board of Health for a SludgeHammer nitrogen-reducing retrofit. Nitrogen-loading calculations submitted with <br /> the application show a reduction from 9.7 parts per million to 5.48 parts per million following the retrofit. No <br /> septic expansion is proposed. <br /> The project includes stormwater management through the use of dry wells for roof runoff. A limit of work <br /> is shown on the plans, extending along the currently altered edge of the yard near the top of the coastal bank. <br /> Because the overall impervious coverage will decrease, no mitigation is required. <br /> Mr. Boricelli further explained that unpermitted cutting had previously occurred within the buffer area. <br /> Upon becoming aware of the violation, the applicant coordinated with staff and met on site to develop a <br /> restoration plan. The plan, prepared by Ian Warner, proposes native plantings to restore the disturbed buffer <br /> area and was submitted as part of the application. <br /> Brian Wall, attorney for the applicant, addressed the request for a waiver from the bylaw requirement for <br /> a 75-foot naturally vegetated buffer. He explained that due to the existing development and site constraints, it <br /> is not feasible to provide the full buffer. He cited the waiver provisions of Chapter 172 and Regulation 12, <br /> noting that the project minimizes adverse impacts by maintaining the same building location, reducing the <br /> footprint, upgrading the septic system to reduce nitrogen loading, and restoring previously disturbed buffer <br /> areas. <br /> Mr. Warner described the restoration plan in detail, stating that it includes the installation of <br /> approximately 20 native trees and 69 native shrubs suitable for a coastal bank environment. He explained that <br /> the plantings are intended to restore ecological function, stabilize the bank, and reestablish native vegetation in <br /> areas previously cleared without a permit. <br /> Commissioners questioned the applicant regarding the walkout basement design, the extent of <br /> unpermitted cutting (estimated at approximately 500-800 square feet), and the distinction between restoration <br /> planting and mitigation. It was clarified that the planting plan is restoration only and is not being offered as <br /> mitigation credit, as no mitigation is required due to the reduced footprint. <br /> Commissioners also discussed a lawn area shown on the plans that appears to encroach from an abutting <br /> property. The applicant indicated a willingness to restore this area with native plantings if required by the <br /> 9 <br />