My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
03/25/2026 ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS Minutes
>
03/25/2026 ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/1/2026 5:02:09 PM
Creation date
4/9/2026 10:20:30 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Mashpee_Meeting Documents
Board
ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
03/25/2026
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
23
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MEETING MINUTES <br /> MASHPEE ZONING BOARD OF APEALS <br /> MARCH 25, 2026 <br /> Ms. Sangeleer mentioned that she reviewed the traffic study report and noticed that <br /> the Saturday study was performed on December 29, and the weekly study in mid- <br /> January. Mr. Vanasse said he performed the traffic count study in November of <br /> 2025. Mr. Vanasse said that CCC guidelines there are seasonal adjustment factors <br /> that review average month and peak month conditions. The volume adjustments <br /> are based on an average month based on the factors that are provided and are <br /> adjusted to peak monthly conditions. <br /> Ms. Sangeleer mentioned that the volume of residents is much less during late fall. <br /> She would like to see the study depict the volume of residents during the summer <br /> months up to the fall. <br /> Mr. Reidy notices a high volume of traffic during the wintertime between the rotary <br /> and Marstons Mills. The summertime has extremely high traffic issues. <br /> Mr. Furbush confirmed that there is only one entrance and exit into the parking <br /> onto Jobs Fishing Rd. He asked what the average weekday number of vehicles is <br /> leaving the parking lot. Mr. Furbush wanted to know how Mr. Vanasse calculated <br /> 122 bedrooms and only provided 96 parking spaces on the Trip Generation slide. <br /> Mr. Haverty said that could be discussed at a later peer review meeting, but the <br /> parking ratio is common for developments of this type and is sufficient. <br /> The Board mentioned that they received several department comments. Mr. Haverty <br /> said he has seen those comments and been addressed throughout the process. The <br /> Board is not required to read all the comments. <br /> Mr. Furbush is most concerned about this project and the comments from the Fire <br /> Department. The access to the top floors, the front of the building. If the Board is <br /> not in favor of the project, it will be submitted to the housing appeals committee. <br /> Mr. Furbush wanted to know what the housing appeals committee will do if this <br /> Board denies this project with the matter of safety. <br /> Mr. Haverty said that if there are fire and safety access concerns raised in several <br /> cases, often the housing appeals committee will vote in favor of the developer. Mr. <br /> Havery said he has retained code red consultants which is a fire safety consultant <br /> group. He mentioned Jeremy Souza is a long-time fire department employee and <br /> has extensive knowledge of fire code requirements and procedures and should be <br /> able to address the fire department concerns during this process. <br /> is <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.