My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
05/07/2026 CONSERVATION COMMISSION Minutes
>
05/07/2026 CONSERVATION COMMISSION Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/15/2026 5:00:46 PM
Creation date
6/15/2026 10:53:55 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Mashpee_Meeting Documents
Board
CONSERVATION COMMISSION
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
05/07/2026
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
23
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Town of Mashpee Conservation Commission <br /> 16 Great Neck Road North <br /> Mashpee, MA 02649 <br /> further stated that the burden of proof remained with the applicant to demonstrate that no unacceptable <br /> adverse impacts would occur. <br /> The applicant's representative stated that the proposed project would provide substantial environmental and <br /> flood resiliency benefits compared to existing site conditions and cautioned that delaying approval of flood- <br /> compliant replacement projects could prolong risks associated with existing vulnerable structures. Following <br /> discussion, the applicant requested a continuance to May 21, 2026, in order to provide the requested <br /> supporting documentation regarding groundwater elevations, nitrogen loading analyses, and related technical <br /> information. <br /> MOTION: To continue 68 Waterway to May 21, 2026. <br /> Motion by: Sandi Godfrey Seconded by: Seana Pitt <br /> Vote: Motion passed unanimously by roll call vote. <br /> Steve Cook,Paul Colombo, Sandi Godfrey, Seana Pitt <br /> MOTION: To take a brief two minute break. <br /> Motion by: Sandi Godfrey Seconded by: Seana Pitt <br /> Vote: Motion passed unanimously by roll call vote. <br /> Steve Cook,Paul Colombo, Sandi Godfrey, Seana Pitt <br /> MOTION: To resume. <br /> Motion by: Sandi Godfrey Seconded by: Seana Pitt <br /> Vote: Motion passed unanimously by roll call vote. <br /> Steve Cook,Paul Colombo, Sandi Godfrey, Seana Pitt <br /> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ <br /> NOI 14 Littleneck Lane,Douglas G.Nahigian Trust.Proposed first floor addition to the existing <br /> foundation, a cantilevered porch, a connecting patio area, and sitting nooks. The work will include <br /> the removal of the existing deck and features. The work includes a septic system upgrade with a <br /> alternative nitrogen reducing system. (Representative: Cape and Islands Engineering, Inc.) 43- <br /> 3416 <br /> The Commission reviewed a Notice of Intent for 14 Littleneck Lane regarding proposed porch additions, septic system <br /> upgrades, and installation of a patio on property located along Ockway Bay,represented by Cape and Islands <br /> Engineering. The applicant's representative described the site resource areas as including land under ocean, land subject <br /> to coastal storm flowage, shellfish habitat, salt marsh, and coastal bank. It was stated that the proposal included <br /> replacement of the existing septic system with a new three-bedroom Title V system incorporating nitrogen-reducing <br /> technology,replacement of existing decks with front and rear porches,installation of a pervious patio behind the <br /> dwelling, and mitigation plantings at the top of the coastal bank. It was further stated that the upgraded septic system <br /> would reduce nitrogen loading calculations from approximately 12.9 to 9.4. <br /> Discussion first addressed the size and placement of the proposed rear patio near the coastal bank. Questions were raised <br /> regarding whether the patio would require structural support or retaining features due to grade changes between the <br /> house and the top of the coastal bank. It was stated that the patio area dropped approximately two feet toward the bank <br /> and that additional cross-sections or structural information might be necessary to evaluate the proposal. <br /> Additional discussion addressed deficiencies and inconsistencies in prior project documentation, including missing soil <br /> logs, groundwater data, and septic system details in earlier submittals. Clarification was also provided regarding the <br /> 12 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.