06/24/2026 ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS Minutes (2)

Home Browse Search

MASHPEE ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS MEETING MINUTES JUNE 24, 2026 7. The Board finds under §174-17 and §174-33 that the proposed project as submitted is not substantially more detrimental to the neighborhood than the existing conditions, and that the plan depicts adequate land area on the subject lot to provide sufficient parking, and there are no new nonconformities being created. CONTINUED HEARINGS Route 28 and Jobs Fishing Road: Petitioner, On Commons LLC C/O, Blatman, Bobrowski, Haverty & Silverstein, LLC is requesting a Comprehensive Permit under M.G.L. 40B §§20-23 to construct sixty-five (65) rental units, including seventeen (17) affordable units on a 1.86-acre site located at the corner of Job's Fishing Road and Falmouth Road (Route 28), on property located in a C-1 Zoning District, Map 74, Parcel 20A-3, Mashpee, MA. (Continued from March 25, May 27, 2026, hearings). Ms. Sangeleer mentioned to the Board that there were new items submitted from the Architectural Peer Reviewer, a letter from Cape Cod Commission, and a printed copy of the wastewater agreement between the Town and Mashpee Commons. Attorney Paul Haverty represents the applicant. Also present was Chris Mulhern, Architect. Mr. Haverty commented that he has some comments but would like to hear more comments from the peer review consultant before responding. Mr. Daniel Riggs, AIA with Embarc is the Board's Architectural Consultant for the proposed project. He provided a letter dated June 12, 2026, with his comments of the existing conditions, suggested additional information, and recommendations. He also provided a slide presentation with his comments depicted in red blocks of the existing lot, the overlay site/landscape plan, the ground floor, first floor plan and the architectural renderings of the proposed building. Mr. Mulhern was not ready to respond to the specific comments of the presentation and comments from the consultant submitted to the Board. The developer wants 65 units and 1.5 cars per unit. He said that he wants to have a discussion with the team and their consultants. In regard to the conflict between the civil plan and the landscape plan, his team controls the destiny on both. They can agree to move the retention zones, catch basins, and trees. There are a number of items raised by the Board's consultant and they are willing to revisit the design as a result of the review.