Laserfiche WebLink
MASHPEE ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS <br /> MEETING MINUTES <br /> JULY 8, 2026 <br /> Ms. Sweet said that the applicants should provide the data in writing to the <br /> Board as soon as possible regarding the comments discussed at the last meeting <br /> on the architecture and could impact the peer review comments submitted on <br /> the traffic. There's a need to rework the site plan and building and may be <br /> difficult to move the hearing process forward until there's a sense of when the <br /> development team can address the feedback from the peer reviewers. <br /> Mr. Alphen asked if the Board is requesting the applicant team address the civil <br /> and architectural comments first before receiving the traffic conversations by the <br /> next meeting. Mr. Alphen mentioned that they will be requesting waivers. <br /> Ms. Sweet said no; the Board will be addressing the traffic peer review at the <br /> July 22nd meeting because (HSH) Howard Stein Hudson will be presenting their <br /> comments. But all three disciplines have been crossing over in their comments, <br /> and all three have been provided to the applicants. <br /> Mr. Alphen agreed that the peer review document was submitted into the record <br /> and stated that his team will address the technical responses and may involve <br /> modifications to the project. <br /> Mr. Reidy commented that this project needs to fit in with design of the <br /> neighborhood and would like the applicants to address issues regarding <br /> pedestrian access within the neighborhood. <br /> Mr. Furbush commented that there are seven pages of issues to address and <br /> asked if the entire document should be read into the record. <br /> Ms. Sweet wanted to make sure that the Board understood the specific concerns <br /> presented by Mr. Pavlik. <br /> Mr. Pavlik questioned if this project would trigger any MEPA reviews based on <br /> the existing Mashpee Commons Project, and this is something the applicant <br /> should also look at. <br /> Attorney Kwesell confirmed that the document does not require it to be read in <br /> its entirety. <br /> Mr. Alphen said that they will provide technical responses as soon as possible. <br /> He mentioned that the Mashpee Commons project is a separate project. <br /> 15 <br />