Laserfiche WebLink
Town of Mashpee Conservation Commission <br /> 16 Great Neck Road North <br /> Mashpee, MA 02649 <br /> MOTION: To have a 2-minute recess. <br /> Motion by: Richard Sahl Seconded by: Seana Pitt <br /> Vote: Motion passed by unanimous vote. <br /> A motion was made to return from recess and was seconded by Steve Cook.The motion <br /> passed by unanimous vote. <br /> • Dock Moratorium <br /> Ms. Pitt provided a follow-up to the Commission's previous discussion regarding a potential dock <br /> moratorium. She reported that, since the last quarterly meeting, she had gathered additional information <br /> concerning potential impacts on other Town departments and the Commission's authority to pursue a <br /> moratorium. <br /> The Harbormaster and Shellfish Division indicated that they neither support nor oppose a moratorium and do <br /> not anticipate a significant impact on their day-to-day operations. Staff added that shellfish seeding costs are <br /> projected to decrease and that both departments would continue providing technical information as the <br /> discussion progresses. <br /> Information obtained from the Assessing Department indicated that waterfront properties are generally <br /> assessed at a higher value because of their water access, while only existing docks are included in property <br /> assessments. It was also noted that a lengthy moratorium could increase the market value of properties with <br /> existing docks because of their limited availability. <br /> Ms. Pitt explained that she had not yet requested an opinion from Town Counsel because other Commission <br /> business had taken priority. She noted that dock moratoriums had been adopted in Warren and Barnstable, <br /> which she believed suggested that Mashpee may have similar authority under home-rule provisions. If the <br /> Commission chose to pursue the concept further, she stated that legal review would be appropriate after a <br /> draft proposal had been developed. <br /> Commissioners discussed the need for additional information before determining whether to pursue a <br /> moratorium. Topics included the number of existing docks in Town, waterfront properties potentially eligible <br /> for future docks, recent dock applications,how other municipalities have structured similar moratoriums, and <br /> whether any future moratorium should apply to coastal waters, freshwater ponds, Areas of Critical <br /> Environmental Concern (ACECs), Natural Heritage areas, or other environmentally sensitive water bodies. <br /> The discussion also addressed whether repairs to existing docks should continue to be allowed during any <br /> moratorium. It was suggested that repairs for safety or navigational purposes and the existing process for <br /> 6 <br />